Games Aren’t Art, They’re Products

Now that I have your attention with that, dare I say it, frankly inflammatory title, I’d like to introduce you to the world of game publishers.

I, being a young and supple boy at the age of twenty, can’t remember a time when publishers were not the gatekeepers to triple-A game production. EA, Activision, THQ (may you rest in peace, my sweet prince), Capcom, Konami, Microsoft, Nintendo, Sony and more were in charge of what games got made and which ones didn’t. I always thought to myself, “Wilikers! These guys must really love games to be putting out so many of them!”.

Every game I had loved came from a developer under a publisher. Pok√©mon, a game by GameFreak, was published, in the U.S., by Nintendo of America. Fable, a game that I would still argue to this day as being quite fun to play, was published by Microsoft. Hell, I don’t even need to list anything here; every one of you know what I’m talking about.

IT WAS A GOOD GAME! NOW, SHUT UP!

IT WAS A GOOD GAME! NOW, SHUT UP!

But these days, it’s becoming more and more obvious to me that publishers don’t like games. With Konami basically pulling every stop it has in its magic bag of tricks to make sure people won’t buy their games, with John Riccitello telling gamers that “The game you bought was the game you got” as though it was a bad thing, with Bobby Kotick saying he’s only interested in a game franchise if Activision can release a new version of it every year for continual profits, I’m doubting more and more everyday of what I thought games meant to publishers.

And then it occurred to me that of course publishers love games. They love them very much, but not in the same way you or I love them. For, you see, in the brain of a publisher, videogames are not art, or even a fun way to spend an evening. Games are products, and nothing more.

This became evident after I kept seeing news articles about how things in the game industry need to die, even from the studios that make the games! There is this destructive culture around the games industry in which we need to kill off anything that wasn’t in a popular game. When co-op and multiplayer games became popular, we needed to kill single-player. When iOS games became popular, we needed to kill console games. This doesn’t make sense in a medium founded and maintained by artists. Art doesn’t have tiers or tools considered too outdated to use. When photography came around, we didn’t abandon painting because it wasn’t as high-resolution or accessible as the camera. Photos were just another way to experience visual art. So why are games not treated with the same retro-respect as other artforms?

Just look how bad this game is! No blast processing whatsoever!

Just look how bad this game is! No blast processing whatsoever!

This is because, in the eye of the industry, games aren’t art, they’re products. Products need to be top of the line. Products need to have more features than the other guy’s products, and if you don’t have the newest feature on your product, it gets left in the dust. If my game had multiplayer, and people liked its multiplayer, then your game needs to have multiplayer, or else it’s like a car without a radio and cupholders.

Thankfully, we still have a plethora of designers willing to ignore what is top of the line and instead focus on one or both of the two key fundamentals of game design: Is it fun? Is it interesting? Fez, TellTale’s The Walking Dead, Skyrim, and Deus Ex: Human Revolution are just a few games that came out recently without a single hint of multiplayer. Some of them even brought back once-decrepit gameplay styles and breathed new life into them.

So, no games aren’t art, at least to a businessman. They’re products, meant to have the shiniest feature money can buy.

Disclaimer: I’m not saying games are not art. They are, that’s non-debatable.

You can follow Frank on Twitter @Fuhjem.

5 thoughts on “Games Aren’t Art, They’re Products

  1. Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The text in your article seem to be running off the screen in Safari.
    I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I figured I’d
    post to let you know. The design and style look great though!
    Hope you get the issue resolved soon. Kudos

    Like

  2. Great post and I get completely your valued points. Perhaps its fair to say that a lot more of the indie publishers are putting out games as art before putting them out as a product.
    ironically , it could just be that if more publishers stopped putting out what they think people want in their game product and instead made them purely artistic, their would be a higher rate of gaming greats.

    Like

  3. Pingback: In Other News – 04 March 2013 | Lazygamer .:: The Worlds Best Video Game News ::.

  4. Spot on, keep trying to explain to those who hate micro-transactions. They are only there as an option, but in the end companies want to make money and that is a viable option. I think gamers forget that those making and publishing the games want to make money, thought some push more strongly than others, it is definitely a factor.

    Like

Leave a Reply as a Guest, or Log In

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s